Learning Preferences to Physiology of Undergraduate Students in a Chinese Medical School

Full Text (PDF, 76KB), PP.1-5

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Yuemin Ding 1 Jianxiang Liu 1 Hong Ruan 1 Xiong Zhang 2

1. Department of Biotechnology, School of Medicine and Life Science, Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou, China

2. Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2012.02.01

Received: 10 Nov. 2011 / Revised: 16 Dec. 2011 / Accepted: 26 Jan. 2012 / Published: 29 Feb. 2012

Index Terms

Learning modes, medical education, physiology

Abstract

Students learning may be classified according to the sensory modalities using VARK instrument, which categorizes learning modes as visual (V), auditory (A), reading-writing (R), or kinesthetic (K). We administered the VARK questionnaire to our second-year medical students, and 98 of 133 students (74%) returned the completed questionnaire. Only 14.3% of the students preferred a single mode of information presentation. In contrast, most students (85.7%) preferred multiple modes of information presentation. Knowing the students preferred modes and using web-based learning system may help the instructors to tailor to the student's individual preference in the teaching of medical science.

Cite This Paper

Yuemin Ding,Jianxiang Liu,Hong Ruan,Xiong Zhang,"Learning Preferences to Physiology of Undergraduate Students in a Chinese Medical School", IJEME, vol.2, no.2, pp.1-5, 2012. DOI: 10.5815/ijeme.2012.02.01

Reference

[1]Miller P. “Learning styles: the multimedia of the mind”. Educational Resources Information Center ED, Vol. 45, pp. 140, 2010.

[2]Tanner K and Allen D. “Approaches to biology teaching and learning: learning styles and the problem of instructional selection-engaging all students in science courses”. Cell Biol Educ. Vol. 3, pp. 197201, 2004

[3]James W and Gardner D. “Learning styles: implications for distance learning”. New Dir Adult Contin Educ. Vol. 67, pp. 1932, 1995.

[4]Fleming ND. I'm different; not dumb. Modes of presentation (VARK) in the tertiary classroom. In: Research and Development in Higher Education, edited by Zelmer A. Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia. Vol. 18, pp. 308313, 1995.

[5]Armstrong E and Parsa-Parsi R. How can physicians' learning styles drive educational planning? Acad Med. Vol. 80, pp. 680684, 2005.

[6]Chan V, Pisegna JM, Rosian RR, and DiCarlo SE. “Construction of a model demonstrating neural pathways and reflex arcs”. Adv Physiol Educ. Vol. 271, pp. 442, 1991.

[7]Kuipers JC and Clemens DL. “Do I dare? Using role-play as a teaching strategy”. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. Vol. 36, pp. 1217, 2008.

[8]Cortright RN, Collins HL, and DiCarlo SE. “Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems”. Adv Physiol Educ. Vol.29, pp.107111, 2005.

[9]Cortright RN, Collins HL, Rodenbaugh DW, and DiCarlo SE. “Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing”. Adv Physiol Educ. Vol.27, pp. 102108, 2003.

[10]Bailey CM, Hsu CT, and DiCarlo SE. “Educational puzzles for understanding gastrointestinal physiology”. Adv Physiol Educ. Vol. 21, pp.118, 2009.

[11]DiCarlo SE and Collins HL. “Colored letters: a tool to increase class participation in a large classroom”. Adv Physiol Educ. Vol. 25, pp.143, 2001.