An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships between Learning Styles based on an Arabic version of the Felder-Silverman Model

Full Text (PDF, 519KB), PP.42-52

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Nahla M. Aljojo 1,* Abeer Alkhouli 2

1. Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Information Systems Department, King Abdul Aziz University, P.O. Box , 132139, Jeddah, 21382, KSA

2. Faculty of Sciences, Department of Statistics, King Abdul Aziz University, P.O. Box 8598, Jeddah, 21492, KSA

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2015.04.05

Received: 6 Dec. 2014 / Revised: 3 Feb. 2015 / Accepted: 2 Mar. 2015 / Published: 8 Apr. 2015

Index Terms

Learning styles, Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Correlation analysis

Abstract

Learning styles vary according to the individual and this diversity is fundamental in terms of teaching as curricula must respond adaptively to the various learning styles of pupils. This study conducts an analysis of an Arabic form of the Index of Learning Styles (ILS), a 44-item questionnaire designed to determine learning styles using the Felder-Silverman learning style model. This study focuses on the interpretation of data derived from the Arabic form of the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) to establish correlations between the learning styles of 1024 female students drawn from two specific departments at the King Abdul-Aziz University in Saudi Arabia. The findings, generated by Multiple Correspondence Analysis and cross-validated by correlation analysis, demonstrate a definite link between certain learning styles from opposing dimensions that are considered to be contradictory within the same dimension of learning. The validity and reliability of the Arabic scale was established and compared to the examples reported in the literature. Findings show comparable reliability and factor analysis supports the interdependencies between dimensions and perhaps the constructs they intend to assess. The results of this paper have implications for the design of e-learning tools, materials and sessions in order to adapt to the relationships between learning styles and have a positive impact on the learners themselves and their learning experience

Cite This Paper

Nahla M. Aljojo, Abeer Alkhouli, "An Empirical Investigation of the Relationships between Learning Styles based on an Arabic version of the Felder-Silverman Model", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), vol.7, no.4, pp.42-52, 2015. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2015.04.05

Reference

[1]Papa Nikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M., Magoulas, G.D., Kornilakis, H. (2002) Towards new forms of knowledge communication: the adaptive dimension of a web-based learning environment, www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu.
[2]Brusilovsky, P., and Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and Intelligent Web-based Educational Systems. International Journal of Arificial Intelligence in Education, 13(2-4), pp159-172.
[3]Paredes, P. and Rodriguez, P. (2004) A Mixed Approach to Modelling Styles in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia, Advanced Technology for Learning.
[4]Briggs Myers, I. (1962). Manual: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.
[5]Gregorc, A. F. (1982a). An Adult's Guide to Style. Gabriel Systems Inc., Maynard, MA.
[6]Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[7]Pask, G. (1976b). Styles and Strategies of Learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128-148.
[8]Honey, P., and Mumford, A. (1982). The Manual of Learning Styles. Peter Honey, Maidenhead.
[9]Dunn, R., and Dunn, K. (1974). Learning Style as a Criterion for Placement in Alternative Programs. Phi Delta Kappan, 56 (4), 275-278.
[10]Felder, R. M., and Soloman, B. A. (1997). Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. Retrieved 30 November, 2007, from http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.html.
[11]Cha, H. J., Kim, Y. S., Park, S. H., Yoon, T. B., Jung, Y.M. and Lee, J.-H. (2006). Learning Style Diagnosis Based on User Interface Behavior for the Customization of Learning Interfaces in an Intelligent Tutoring System. In M. Ikeda, K. D. Ashley and T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8thInternational Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, LNCS Vol. 4053, pp. 513–524, Springer-Verlag.
[12]Garcia, P., Amandi, A., Schiaffino, S. and Campo, M. (2006). Evaluating Bayesian networks’ precision for detecting students’ learning styles. Computers and Education, in press.
[13]1Graf, S. and Kinshuk (2006) An Approach for detecting Learning Styles in Learning Management Systems. In Proceedings of ICALT 2006, 6th IEEE Int. Conf. on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2006), IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, pp. 161–163.
[14]Carver, C. A., Howard, R. A. and Lane, W. D (1999). Enhancing Student Learning Through Hypermedia Courseware and Incorporation of Student Learning Styles, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 42, no. 1, 1999, pp. 33-38.
[15]Gilbert, J. E. and Han C. Y. (1999). Arthur: Adapting Instruction to Accommodate Learning Style. Proceedings ofWebNetʹ99, World Conference of the WWW and Internet, Honolulu, HI, 433-438.
[16]Specht, M. and Oppermann, R. (1998). ACE - Adaptive Courseware Environment. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 4, 141-161.
[17]Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., & Fullick, P. (2003).Incorporating learning styles in hypermedia environment: Empirical evaluation. In P. de Bra, H. C. Davis, J. Kay & M. Schraefel (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems (pp. 41–52). Nottingham, UK.
[18]Wolf, C. (2003). Towards `Learning Style'-Based E-Learning in Computer Science Education.In Proceedings of the Australasian Computing Education Conference.Adelaide, Australia, pp. 273-279.
[19]Papanikolaou K, Grigoriadou M, Kornilakis H and Magoulas G D (2003) Personalising the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of INSPIRE User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, forthcoming.
[20]Peña, C.,I. (2004). Intelligent Agents to Improve Adaptivity in a Web-Based Learning Environment.University of Girona.
[21]Peña,C.I, J.L. Marzo. and J.L. de la Rosa (2002). “Intelligent agents in a teaching and learning environment on the web”, IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2002).Kazan, Russia.
[22]Kelly, D. (2005). On the dynamic multiple intelligence informed personalization of the learning environment. University of Dublin, TrinityFaculty, Dublin.
[23]Paredes, P. and Rodriguez, P. (2004) A Mixed Approach toModelling Styles in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia, Advanced Technolo.gy for Learning.
[24]Aljojo, N. (2012) Teacher Assisting and Subject Adaptive Material system: An Arabic Adaptive Learning Environment. University o f Portsmouth, Portsmouth.
[25]Felder, R. M. & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education, Engr. Education, 78(7), 674-681.
[26]Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the Second Tier: Learning and Teaching Styles in Faculty Science Education, J. Coll. Sci. Teaching, 23, 5, 286-290.
[27]Viola, S., Graf, S, R., Kinshuk and Leo T. (2007). Investigating relationships within the Indexof Learning Styles: a data driven approach, Interactive Technology & Smart Education, pp. 7-18.
[28]Santhi, C, J. G. Arnold, J. R. Williams, W. A. Dugas, R. Srinivasan,and L. M. Hauck. (2001). Validation of the SWAT model on alarge river basin with point and nonpoint sources. J. AmericanWater Resources Assoc. 37(5): 1169-1188.
[29]Van Liew, M. W., J. G. Arnold, and J. D. Garbrecht. (2003). Hydrologicsimulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing betweentwo models. Trans. ASAE 46(6): 1539-1551.
[30]Legates, D. R., and G. J. McCabe. 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Res. 35(1): 233-241.
[31]Aitchison, J. (1986) The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. Chapman and Hall, London.
[32]Abdi H., Dominique V (2007) Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Neil Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
[33]Warwick, K. M., & Morineau, A. (1984). Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[34]Greenacre, M.J (1984). Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis, Academic Press, New York, 1984.
[35]Felder, R.M. and J. Spurlin. (2005). “Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles: a Meta-analysis.” International Journal of Engineering Education. 21(1), 103–112.
[36]Zywno, M. S. (2003) A Contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder-Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles. In Proceedings of the 2003 AmericanSociety for Engineering Annual Conference and Exposition. Available online at http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/Zywno _Validation_Study.pdf (retrieved October, 2006).
[37]Litzinger, T. A., Lee, S. H., and Wise, J. C. (2005) AStudy of the Reliability and Validity of the Felder-Solomon Index of Learning Styles. In Proceedings of the2005 American Society for Engineering Annual Conferenceand Exposition. Available at http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/Litzinger_Validation_Study.pdf (retrieved October, 2006).
[38]Livesay, G., Dee, K., Felder, R., Hites, L., Nauman, E. & O'Neal, E., Statistical Evaluation of the Index of Learning Styles, Session 2430, 2002 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, (2002).