Cognitive Barriers in Trainig the Students of Higher Education Institutions, Methodology for Their Elucidation and Overcoming

Full Text (PDF, 454KB), PP.1-11

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

V.K. Voronov 1,* L.A. Gerashchenko 2

1. National research Irkutsk state technical university, Irkutsk, Russia

2. Bratsk state university, Bratsk, Russia

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2013.02.01

Received: 4 Nov. 2012 / Revised: 25 Dec. 2012 / Accepted: 2 Jan. 2013 / Published: 8 Feb. 2013

Index Terms

Principle of developing education, Cog-nitive barriers, Regularities of misunderstanding of a training material, Statistical analysis of databank

Abstract

The paper deals with a problem (studied by the authors for several years) of the cognitive barriers (difficulties) related to the third component of a peda-gogical triad “how to learn, what to learn, how to study”. At the first stage, methodical approaches to the control of students knowledge in mathematical and natural-science disciplines were worked our. At the next stage, the cognitive barriers of the students arising in the course of studying the above-mentioned disciplines were elucidated. The results obtained during the performance of the two specified stages allowed methodological rec-ommendations related to “The concept of modern natu-ral sciences” discipline to be developed.

Cite This Paper

V.K. Voronov, L.A. Gerashchenko, "Cognitive Barriers in Training the Students of Higher Education Institutions, Methodology for Their Elucidation and Overcoming", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), vol.5, no.2, pp.1-11, 2013. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2013.02.01

Reference

[1]A.AGranatov, A complementarity method in ped-agogical thinking: methodology of developing education, Ph.D. Thesis, Chelyabinsk, 1993.
[2]A.I.Pilipenko, Cognitive barriers in training to physics and methodological principles of their overcoming,. Ph.D. Thesis, Kursk, 1997.
[3]V.A.Popkov, A.V.Korzhuyev, Theory and prac-tice of higher education: a tutorial for the system of additional pedagogical education. Moscow, 2004.
[4]L.A.Gerashchenko, V.K.Voronov, Kim De Chan, On the results of knowledge control of the stu-dents studying discipline of the concept of modern natural sciences. Vestn. Ross. Univer. Druzhby Narodov. Ser. Fundamental Natural-Science Education, No. 8, 2003.
[5]L.A.Gerashchenko, V.K.Voronov, V.N.Petrovs-kaya, Kim Dt Chan, Peculiarities of knowledge control of the students studying discipline “The concept of modern natural sciences”. Vestn. IrG-TU, No. 4, 2004.
[6]L.A.Gerashchenko,V.K.Voronov,V.N.Petrovskaya, Kim De Chan, “Peculiarities of knowledge con-trol of external students studying the discipline of “The concept of modern natural sciences”, Pro-ceedings of the international scientific and practical conference, Irkutsk, IRGTU, Russia, 2005.
[7]L.A.Gerashchenko, V.K.Voronov, Kim De Chan, Cognitive difficulties (barriers) in training the discipline “Concepts of modern natural sci-ences”. Vestn. IrGTU, No. 3, 2006.
[8]L.A.Gerashchenko, V.K.Voronov, Kim De Chan, A problem of cognitive difficulties in students of higher education institutions in studying of mathematical and natural-science disciplines. Vestn. Kostromskogo Univ., No. 3, 2009.
[9]V.K.Voronov, L.A.Gerashchenko, Pedagogical model for identification and overcoming the cog-nitive barriers in students of technical univer-sities. Vest. IrGTU. , No. 1, 2012.
[10]Novikov D. A. Statistical methods in pedagogical research. M: 2004.
[11]O.E.Bashina , A.A.Spirin, General theory of sta-tistics, 5th ed., Moskow, 2001.