Project-Based Learning with Gallery Walk: The Association with the Learning Motivation and Achievement

Full Text (PDF, 688KB), PP.1-13

Views: 0 Downloads: 0


Zamree Che-aron 1 Wannisa Matcha 1,*

1. Department of Computer and Informatics for Management, Faculty of Communication Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand

* Corresponding author.


Received: 18 Jun. 2023 / Revised: 10 Jul. 2023 / Accepted: 19 Aug. 2023 / Published: 8 Oct. 2023

Index Terms

Project-based learning, gallery walk, learning motivation, perceived usefulness, learning achievement, lifelong learning


With the rapid and constant changes in computer and information technology, the content and learning methods in Computer Science related courses need to be continuously adapted and consistently aligned with the latest developments in the field. This paper proposes a learning approach called the Gallery-walk integrated Project-Based Learning (G-PBL) which can develop students’ lifelong learning skills that are extremely crucial for Computer Science students. The G-PBL was designed by incorporating the advantages of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and gallery walk learning strategy. In contrast to traditional PBL where students may present their project work to instructors only, students have to present their project work to their classmates as part of the G-PBL approach. All students are required to evaluate their peers’ project work and then give feedback and suggestions. For the research experiments, the G-PBL was implemented as an instructional approach in two Computer Science related courses. This study focuses on exploring the differences in knowledge gain, learning motivation, and perceived usefulness when learning by using the teacher-centered and G-PBL approach. Moreover, the impact of gender differences on learning outcomes is also investigated. The results reveal that using the G-PBL approach helps students to gain more knowledge significantly, for both male and female students. In terms of motivation, female students are more favorable toward the G-PBL approach. On the contrary, male students prefer learning via a teacher-centered approach. Regarding the perceived usefulness, female students strongly view the G-PBL as a highly effective learning approach, whereas male students are more prone to concur that the teacher-centered approach is a more effective learning method.

Cite This Paper

Zamree Che-aron, Wannisa Matcha, "Project-Based Learning with Gallery Walk: The Association with the Learning Motivation and Achievement", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.15, No.5, pp. 1-13, 2023. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2023.05.01


[1]R. Baran, “Computer Science Aspects in Lifelong Learning,” in 7th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices, IEEE, 2011, pp. 476–480.
[2]R. Shen, J. Chiou, and M. J. Lee, “Becoming Lifelong Learners: CS Learners’ Autonomy,” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, vol. 35, no. 8. pp. 267–267, 2020.
[3]P. Guo, N. Saab, L. S. Post, and W. Admiraal, “A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures,” Int J Educ Res, vol. 102, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.
[4]K. L. Smart and N. Csapo, “Learning by doing: Engaging students through learner-centered activities,” Business Communication Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 451–457, 2007, doi: 10.1177/10805699070700040302.
[5]X. Yuan, D. Song, and R. He, “Re-Examining ‘Learning by Doing’: Implications from Learning Style Migration,” Design Journal, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/14606925.2018.1444126.
[6]P. H. Winne, “Modeling self-regulated learning as learners doing learning science: How trace data and learning analytics help develop skills for self-regulated learning,” Metacogn Learn, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 773–791, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11409-022-09305-y.
[7]A. Markula and M. Aksela, “The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education,” Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, vol. 4, no. 1, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x.
[8]M. Tanaka, “Motivation, self-construal, and gender in project-based learning,” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2022, doi: 10.1080/17501229.2022.2043870.
[9]C. L. Chiang and H. Lee, “The Effect of Project-Based Learning on Learning Motivation and Problem-Solving Ability of Vocational High School Students,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 709–712, 2016, doi: 10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.779.
[10]C. S. Johnson and S. Delawsky, “Project-based learning and student engagement,” Academic Research Interanational, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 560–571, 2013.
[11]Edutopia, “PBL Research Summary: Studies Validate Project-Based Learning,” Edutopia. Apr. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available:
[12]S. Ramsaroop and N. Petersen, “Building professional competencies through a service learning ‘gallery walk’ in primary school teacher education,” Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 1–18, 2020, doi: 10.53761/
[13]I. Vale and A. Barbosa, “Promoting Mathematical Knowledge and Skills in a Mathematical Classroom Using a Gallery Walk,” International Journal of Research in Education and Science, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1211–1225, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.46328/ijres.2417.
[14]World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), “World Intellectual Property Indicators 2022,” 2022. doi: 10.34667/tind.47082.
[15]P. H. Winne and A. F. Hadwin, “Studying as Self-Regulated Learning,” Metacognition in educational theory and practice, vol. 93, pp. 277–304, 1998.
[16]M. Vansteenkiste, W. Lens, and E. L. Deci, “Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation,” Educ Psychol, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 19–31, 2006.
[17]J. M. Froiland and F. C. Worrell, “Intrinsic motivation, learning goals, engagement, and achievement in a diverse high school,” Psychol Sch, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 321–336, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1002/pits.21901.
[18]G. Garon-Carrier et al., “Intrinsic Motivation and Achievement in Mathematics in Elementary School: A Longitudinal Investigation of Their Association,” Child Dev, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 165–175, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1111/cdev.12458.
[19]H. Jang, “Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity.,” J Educ Psychol, vol. 100, no. 4, p. 798, 2008.
[20]M. Akif Ocak and Ç. Uluyol, “Investigation of college students’ intrinsic motivation in project based learning,” 2010. [Online]. Available:
[21]T. Yashima, R. Nishida, and A. Mizumoto, “Influence of Learner Beliefs and Gender on the Motivating Power of L2 Selves,” The Modern Language Journal, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 691–711, Dec. 2017, doi:
[22]J. W. Thomas, Project-based learning: Overview. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education, 1998.
[23]D. Kokotsaki, V. Menzies, and A. Wiggins, “Project-based learning: a review of the literature,” Improving schools, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 267–277, 2016, [Online]. Available:
[24]R. A. Ralph, “Post secondary project-based learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics,” J Technol Sci Educ, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2016, doi: 10.3926/jotse.155.
[25]R. a. Bjork, J. Dunlosky, and N. Kornell, “Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions,” Annu Rev Psychol, vol. 64, no. 1, p. 120928131529005, 2013, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.
[26]L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research Methods in Education, 6th ed. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2007. doi: 10.4324/9781315456539-19.
[27]H. Taherdoost, “What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale,” International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 2296–1747, 2019, [Online]. Available:
[28]M. R. Lynn, “Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity,” Nurs Res, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 382–286, 1986.
[29]L. R. Aiken, “Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings,” Educ Psychol Meas, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 131–142, 1985, doi: doi:10.1177/0013164485451012.
[30]L. R. Aiken, “Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires,” Educ Psychol Meas, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 955–959, 1980, doi: 10.1177/001316448004000419.
[31]E. Irawan and H. Wilujeng, “Development of an online mathematical misconception instrument,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, IOP Publishing Ltd, Oct. 2020. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012080.
[32]R. A. Ralph, “Post secondary project-based learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics,” J Technol Sci Educ, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2016, doi: 10.3926/jotse.155.
[33]A. Henry and H. Väst, “Gender differences in L2 motivation: A reassessment,” in Gender gap: Causes, experiences and effects, 2011, pp. 81–102. [Online]. Available: