Implementation of Weighted Product Method for Evaluating Performance of Technicians

Full Text (PDF, 572KB), PP.30-42

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Ardiles Sinaga 1,* Disma Maulana 2

1. Faculty of Vocational, Institut Teknologi Del, Indonesia

2. Universitas Widyatama, Bandung, 40125, Indonesia

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2022.04.03

Received: 11 Apr. 2020 / Revised: 25 Jun. 2020 / Accepted: 19 Sep. 2020 / Published: 8 Aug. 2022

Index Terms

Decision Support System, Technician, Weighted Product Method, Performance Evaluation Technician, PT Telkom Access Ujung Berung.

Abstract

The ISP is responsible for providing programmable cables or DSL modems. The ISP will send a technician to run the cabling and activate the service to the home or office. There are several obstacles from observations made at PT Telkom Akses Ujung Berung in evaluating the performance of Technicians. Management has difficulty evaluating the performance of the desired assessment technician. The evaluation process still uses an assessment based on subjective perceptions from the team leader, this is due to the absence of appropriate methods to be applied in the process of evaluating the performance of technicians at PT Telkom Akses Ujung Berung. One way to overcome the problem is the existence of a method for making appropriate decisions to assess or evaluate the performance of the Technician. The purpose of this research is to implement a decision support system that is implemented in an application performance evaluation technician with the Android-based Weight Product method that can solve problems by multiplying to connect the attribute rating with the corresponding weight attribute. In this method, there are 5 criteria used and 12 alternative ratings for PT. Telkom Access Ujung Berung. The results of this research are the highest results from the criteria, which are sorted from the highest to the lowest technician scores so that it can facilitate the management in evaluating the performance of technicians at PT Telkom Akses Ujung Berung.

Cite This Paper

Ardiles Sinaga, Disma Maulana, "Implementation of Weighted Product Method for Evaluating Performance of Technicians", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), Vol.14, No.4, pp. 30-42, 2022. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2022.04.03

Reference

[1]M. Swarnalatha and J. Komala, “Enhancement of Autonomous System for Inter Provider Service Using Multi-Protocol Label Switching,” i-Manager’s J. Wirel. Commun. Networks, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 21, 2017.
[2]L. Hoxha, “A PRACTICAL APPROACH FOR PROVIDING QOS OF THE INTERNET IN ALBANIA,” J. Eur. Acad. Res., 2017.
[3]Z. Song, P. W. C. Prasad, A. Alsadoon, L. Pham, and A. Elchouemi, “Upgrading Internet service provider (ISP) network in multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) and border gateway protocol (BGP) environment,” in 2016 International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering (ICAEES), 2016, pp. 237–241.
[4]E. Budiman, D. Moeis, and R. Soekarta, “Broadband quality of service experience measuring mobile networks from consumer perceived,” in 2017 3rd International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech), 2017, pp. 423–428.
[5]A. Umamageswari, “STARK–Simultaneous Tracking And Ranking Using Word Cloud.”
[6]N. Aminudin, E. Sundari, K. Shankar, P. Deepalakshmi, R. I. Fauzi, and A. Maseleno, “Weighted Product and Its Application to Measure Employee Performance,” Int. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 7, no. 2.26, pp. 102–108, 2018.
[7]D. M. Khairina, M. R. Asrian, and H. R. Hatta, “Decision support system for new employee recruitment using weighted product method,” in 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 2016, pp. 297–301.
[8]I. M. Budihardjo, Panduan Praktis Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan. RAIH ASA SUKSES, 2015.
[9]D. Nofriansyah and S. Defit, Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Deepublish, 2017.
[10]F. Sari, Metode Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan. Deepublish, 2018.
[11]I. Hariyanti and W. Wiguna, “Perbandingan Metode Weighted Product dengan Simple Additive Weighting untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Kasir,” J. RESPONSIF Ris. Sains Inform., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 33–45, 2019.
[12]P. Mauliana, W. Wiguna, and D. Widyaman, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Kinerja Pramuniaga Toserba Yogya Ciwalk Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” Infotronik J. Teknol. Inf. dan Elektron., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–94, 2018.
[13]M. Mirawati, A. B. Hikmah, and W. Wiguna, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Kasir Lotte Mart Menggunakan Metode Weighted Product,” IJCIT (Indonesian J. Comput. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, 2018.
[14]A. Sinaga and M. Murnawan, “ANALISIS DAN PERANCANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENILAIAN PRESTASI KERJA PNS DENGAN ANALITYCAL HIERARCHY PROCESS,” Pros. Semnastek, 2018.
[15]W. Wiguna and T. Alawiyah, “Sistem Reservasi Paket Wisata Pelayaran Menggunakan Mobile Commerce di Kota Bandung,” J. VOI (Voice Informatics), vol. 8, no. 2, 2019.
[16]W. Wiguna, P. Mauliana, and A. Y. Permana, “Pengembangan E-Helpdesk Support System Berbasis Web di PT Akur Pratama,” J. RESPONSIF Ris. Sains Inform., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2020.
[17]D. Nofriansyah, S. Kom, and M. Kom, Konsep Data Mining Vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Deepublish, 2015.
[18]Y. Hasan, “THE LIABILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS IN PALESTINE.”
[19]PT. TA Ujung Berung, “Tecnisions Performance Data in PT. Telkom Akses Ujung Berung,” Bandung, 2020.
[20]A. Satyaputra, Beginning Android Programming with ADT Bundle. Elex Media Komputindo, 2014.
[21]M. kom. Aziz, Abdul, D. A. budi. M. K. Utami, K. Umam, and I. nur Dzaki, Bermain Android itu Mudah : Studi Kasus Pembuatan eM-Tilang. Yogyakarta: CV BUDI UTAMA, 2018.