International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications (IJISA)
IJISA Vol. 12, No. 6, 8 Dec. 2020
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 338KB)
Evaluation of Websites by Many Criteria Using the Algorithm for Pairwise Comparison of Alternatives
Full Text (PDF, 338KB), PP.64-74
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Author(s)
Rasim M. Alguliyev
1,*
Gulnara Ch. Nabibayova
1
Saadat R. Abdullayeva
1
Index Terms
Website, website classification, site category, criteria for site evaluation, target audience, expert, web page, site navigation, method, multicriteria website evaluation, algorithm for pairwise comparison of alternatives
Abstract
The article proposes a comprehensive method for the multicriteria evaluation of websites. The essence of this method is that using this method we can not only evaluate a website traditionally, but also obtain the following useful results: importance coefficient of each of the criteria, the evaluation of the website for each criterion individually. Moreover, we can also compare the sampled websites and then rank them. It is noted that in order to get the precise result, the sampled websites must be referred to the same category, that is, have the same set of criteria for evaluation.
Cite This Paper
Rasim M. Alguliyev, Gulnara Ch. Nabibayova, Saadat R. Abdullayeva, "Evaluation of Websites by Many Criteria Using the Algorithm for Pairwise Comparison of Alternatives", International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications(IJISA), Vol.12, No.6, pp.64-74, 2020. DOI:10.5815/ijisa.2020.06.05
Reference
[1]Makarets A.B. Methodology for assessing the quality of marketing communications of university websites // Open Education, 2009, No. 4, 45-56.
[2]Types and forms of websites. How to choose? https://kodolex.com/en/blog/web/website-types/
[3]Poluboyarov V.V. Ratings of university sites as a tool for external assessment of the situation of the educational organization in the formation of management strategies. SCIENTIFIC NOTES. Series History. Political science. Economy. Informatics. 2014 No. 15 (186). Issue 31/1. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/reytingi-saytov-vuzov-kak-instrument-vneshney-otsenki-polozheniya-obrazovatelnoy-organizatsii-pri-formirovanii-strategii-upravleniya
[4]Ranking Web of Universities. http://www.webometrics.info/
[5]Khodakova OV, Yevstafyeva Yu.V. Comprehensive assessment of official websites of medical organizations. Health care of the Russian Federation, Russian journal. 2016; 61 (2)/ https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kompleksnaya-otsenka-ofitsialnyh-saytov-meditsinskih-organizatsiy
[6]Reuben Alfred, Shubi F. Kaijage. Design of an Integrated Android Mobile Application and Web-Based System (IAMAWBS) as a Solution to Concerns of Passengers Using Bus Rapid Transit System for Public Transportation in Dar Es Salaam // I.J. Information Technology and Computer Science, 2019, No. 2, pp. 30-37.
[7]Ishaq O. Oyefolahan, Aishat A. Sule, Solomon A. Adepoju, Faiza Babakano. Keeping with the Global Trends: An Evaluation of Accessibility and Usability of Nigerian Banks Websites // I.J. Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 2019, No. 2, pp. 44-53.
[8]Oleg Pursky, Dmytro Mazoha. Architecture Model of Integrated Web-based Etrading Business Process Management System // I.J. Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 2018, No. 2, pp. 1-8.
[9]The concept and classification of information resources. Structure in management information support, https://studfiles.net/preview/6266132/
[10]Market analysis – types of sites, http://www.imagos.ru/uslugi.php?id=1010#12
[11]Types of sites, http://seoklub.ru/tipy_saitov.html
[12]Evaluation criteria for Internet resources, https://uchebniki-besplatno.com/didaktika_1434/kriterii-otsenki-internet-58647.html
[13]Criteria for assessing websites, http://www.i2r.ru/static/255/out_17474.shtml;
[14]Kubasheva E.S., Gavrilov A.G. Methodology for assessing the quality of web applications // Software systems and computational methods, 2013, No. 1 (2), pp. 28-34
[15]Evaluation of university websites. Novosibirsk State Technical University, http://www.nstu.ru/staff/eguide/evaluatingweb/#1
[16]HON Code Principles // Health On the Net Foundation
[17]ISO 13407 – Human-centred design processes for interactive systems, https://www.iso.org/standard/21197.html
[18]ISO 18529 – Ergonomics of human-system interaction, https://www.iso.org/standard/33499.html
[19]ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts, https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en
[20]ISO / IEC 40210: 2011 – Information technology – W3C SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework (Second Edition), https://www.iso.org/standard/58335.html
[21]ISO / IEC 40500: 2012 (W3C) Information technology - W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0, https://www.iso.org/standard/58625.html
[22]Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan “On obtaining information” (September 30, 2005), http://www.e-qanun.az/framework/11142
[23]“National Strategy for the Development of Science in the Republic of Azerbaijan in 2009–2015” (May 4, 2009), http://www.e-qanun.az/framework/17199
[24]Decision of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Azerbaijan on approval of “Requirements on creation and management of Internet information resources of state bodies” (September 4, 2012), http://e-qanun.gov.az/framework/24256
[25]“National Strategy for Development of Information Society in the Republic of Azerbaijan for 2014–2020” (April 2, 2014), https://president.az/articles/11312
[26]Saati T.L. Making decisions. Hierarchy Analysis Method. M.: Radio and communications, 1993, 278 p.
[27]Petrichenko G.S., Petrichenko V.G. Methodology for assessing the competence of experts // Electronic scientific journal KubSAU, 2015, No. 109 (05), http://ej.kubagro.ru/2015/05/pdf/04.pdf