[1]S. A. Aljawarneh, “Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education,” J. Comput. High. Educ., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 57–73, 2020.
[2]F. Caputo, B. Buhnova, and L. Walletzký, “Investigating the role of smartness for sustainability: insights from the Smart Grid domain,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1299–1309, 2018.
[3]M. Levy, “WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 120–134, 2009.
[4]J. . Kazoka and K. Mwantimwa, “Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use of Web 2.0 tools in University Teaching and Learning in Tanzania,” Univ. Dar es Salaam Libr. J., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 19–37, 2019.
[5]K. Mwantimwa and A. Nkhoma-wamunza, “Perception on Adoption and Application of Web 2.0 Technologies in Selected Academic Libraries in Tanzania,” Univ. Dar es Salaam Libr. J., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 17–30, 2016.
[6]N. F. Mosha, P. Ngulube, and E. T. Lwoga, “Antecedents for the Utilisation of Web 2 . 0 Tools for Knowledge Management Practices in Academic Libraries of Tanzania,” Libr. Philos. Pract., pp. 1–22, 2019.
[7]A. Bhattacherjee, “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model,” MIS Q., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 351–370, 2001.
[8]Z. Bao and B. Shang, “Self-efficacy and continuance intention of Web 2.0 platforms: a meta-analysis,” Data Technol. Appl., no. 19, 2021.
[9]J. B. Singh, R. Chandwani, and M. Kumar, “Factors affecting Web 2 . 0 adoption : exploring the knowledge sharing and knowledge seeking aspects in healthcare professionals,” 2016.
[10]A. McAfee, Enterprise 2.0: New collaborative tools for your organisation’s toughest challenges. Harvard Business Press, 2009.
[11]H. C. Chu, G. J. Hwang, C. C. Tsai, and N. S. Chen, “An innovative approach for promoting information exchanges and sharing in a web 2.0-based learning environment,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 311–323, 2009, doi: 10.1080/10494820903195173.
[12]K. A. Kumar and S. Natarajan, “An extension of the Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM) to study continuance behavior in using e-Health services,” Innov. Mark., vol. 16, no. 2, p. 15, 2020.
[13]S. Chauhan, S. Goyal, A. K. Bhardwaj, and B. S. Sergi, “Examining continuance intention in business schools with digital classroom methods during COVID-19: a comparative study of India and Italy,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 1596–1619, 2022.
[14]E. T. Aydınlıyurt, N. Taşkın, S. Scahill, and A. Toker, “Continuance intention in gamified mobile applications: A study of behavioral inhibition and activation systems,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 61, p. 102414, 2021.
[15]M. A. Hossain and M. Quaddus, “Expectation–confirmation theory in information system research: A review and analysis,” Inf. Syst. Theory Explain. Predict. Our Digit. Soc. Vol. 1, pp. 441–469, 2012.
[16]E. Kim and S. Han, “Determinants of continuance intention to use health apps among users over 60: a test of social cognitive model,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 18, no. 19, p. 10367, 2021.
[17]T. Zhou, “Understanding online knowledge community user continuance: A social cognitive theory perspective,” Data Technol. Appl., 2018.
[18]C.-P. Lin, “Learning virtual community loyalty behavior from a perspective of social cognitive theory,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 345–360, 2010.
[19]S. Wang and S. S. J. Lin, “The application of social cognitive theory to web‐based learning through NetPorts,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 600–612, 2007.
[20]K. D. Carillo, “Social cognitive theory in is research–literature review, criticism, and research agenda,” in Information Systems, Technology and Management: 4th International Conference, ICISTM 2010, Bangkok, Thailand, March 11-13, 2010. Proceedings 4, Springer, 2010, pp. 20–31.
[21]C. Shen and J. Chiou, “The effect of community identification on attitude and intention toward a blogging community,” Internet Res., 2009.
[22]W. S. Chow and L. S. Chan, “Social network, social trust and shared goals in organisational knowledge sharing,” Inf. Manag., vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 458–465, 2008.
[23]X. Lin, M. Featherman, and S. Sarker, “Understanding factors affecting users’ social networking site continuance: A gender difference perspective,” Inf. Manag., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 383–395, 2017.
[24]D. A. Mandira, S. Suliyanto, and A. T. Nawarini, “The Influence Customer Trust, Service Quality, and Perceived Price on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty,” J. Res. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2018, doi: 10.32424/jorim.v1i1.16.
[25]T. Vuuren, M. Roberts-Lombard, and E. Tonder, “Customer satisfaction, trust and commitment as predictors of customer loyalty within an optometric practice environment,” South. African Bus. Rev., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 81–96, 2013.
[26]Rico, M. Tecoalu, S. Wahyoedi, and E. D. Purnama, “The Effects of Trust, Service Quality and Perceived Value on Satisfaction and Their Impact on Loyalty,” pp. 325–330, 2019, doi: 10.5220/0008492603250330.
[27]M. Kügler, S. Smolnik, and P. Raeth, “Determining the factors influencing enterprise social software usage: Development of a measurement instrument for empirical assessment,” in 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, 2013, pp. 3635–3644.
[28]M. Kügler, C. Lübbert, and S. Smolnik, “Organisational climate’s role in enterprise social software usage: an empirical assessment,” 2015.
[29]A. Kankanhalli, B. C. Y. Tan, and K.-K. Wei, “Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation,” MIS Q., pp. 113–143, 2005.
[30]W. Chiu, H. Cho, and C. G. Chi, “Consumers’ continuance intention to use fitness and health apps: an integration of the expectation–confirmation model and investment model,” Inf. Technol. People, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 978–998, 2020, doi: 10.1108/ITP-09-2019-0463.
[31]L. Festinger, A theory of cognitive dissonance, vol. 2. Stanford university press, 1962.
[32]T. Wang, C.-L. Lin, and Y.-S. Su, “Continuance Intention of University Students and Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Modified Expectation Confirmation Model Perspective,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 8, p. 4586, 2021.
[33]A. Y. Yaakop, N. Mahadi, Z. Z. Ariffin, Z. R. A. Hasan, and M. Harun, “Examining students’ continuance usage intention for web-based educational tools: A developed integrated structural model approach,” Asian Acad. Manag. J., vol. 25, no. 1, 2020.
[34]M. Dalvi-Esfahani, L. Wai Leong, O. Ibrahim, and M. Nilashi, “Explaining students’ continuance intention to use Mobile web 2.0 learning and their perceived learning: An integrated approach,” J. Educ. Comput. Res., vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1956–2005, 2020.
[35]A. Ferreira, G. M. Silva, and Á. L. Dias, “Determinants of continuance intention to use mobile self-scanning applications in retail,” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag., 2021.
[36]A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, p. 191, 1977.
[37]M. Igbaria and J. Iivari, “The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage,” Omega, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 587–605, 1995, doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(95)00035-6.
[38]M. S. Rosli and N. S. Saleh, “Technology enhanced learning acceptance among university students during Covid-19: Integrating the full spectrum of Self-Determination Theory and self-efficacy into the Technology Acceptance Model,” Curr. Psychol., no. 0123456789, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-02996-1.
[39]S. Kulviwat, G. C. Bruner II, and J. P. Neelankavil, “Self-efficacy as an antecedent of cognition and affect in technology acceptance,” J. Consum. Mark., 2014.
[40]V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test,” Decis. Sci., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 451–481, 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x.
[41]T. Pontoh, “The Effect Of Computer Self-Efficacy , Computer Anxiety , And Perceived Enjoyment On The Attitudes Computer Users,” vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 48–55, 2018.
[42]S. S. Binyamin, M. J. Rutter, and S. Smith, “The influence of computer self-efficacy and subjective norms on the students’ use of learning management systems at King Abdulaziz University,” Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 693–699, 2018.
[43]I. S. Rekha, J. Shetty, and S. Basri, “Students’ continuance intention to use MOOCs: empirical evidence from India,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4265–4286, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11308-w.
[44]H. E. Mandari and D. N. Koloseni, “Determinants of continuance intention of using e-government services in Tanzania: the role of system interactivity as moderating factor,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 15–38, 2023.
[45]G. Huang and Y. Ren, “Linking technological functions of fitness mobile apps with continuance usage among Chinese users: Moderating role of exercise self-efficacy,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 103, no. March 2019, pp. 151–160, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.013.
[46]X. Zhang, X. Han, Y. Dang, F. Meng, X. Guo, and J. Lin, “User acceptance of mobile health services from users’ perspectives: The role of self-efficacy and response-efficacy in technology acceptance,” Informatics Heal. Soc. Care, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 194–206, 2017, doi: 10.1080/17538157.2016.1200053.
[47]H. F. Lin, “Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study,” Int. J. Manpow., vol. 28, no. 3–4, pp. 315–332, 2007, doi: 10.1108/01437720710755272.
[48]G.-W. Bock, R. W. Zmud, Y.-G. Kim, and J.-N. Lee, “Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organisational climate,” MIS Q., pp. 87–111, 2005.
[49]E. Lwoga and M. Komba, “Antecedents of continued usage intentions of web-based learning management system in Tanzania,” Educ. + Train., vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 738–756, 2015.
[50]N. P. Rana and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Citizen’s adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT),” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 172–181, 2015.
[51]B. Van Den Hooff and J. A. De Ridder, “Knowledge sharing in context: the influence of organisational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 117–130, 2004.
[52]J. R. A. Mhina, M. G. Md Johar, and M. H. Alkawaz, “The Influence of Perceived Confidentiality Risks and Attitude on Tanzania Government Employees’ Intention to Adopt Web 2.0 and Social Media for Work-Related Purposes,” Int. J. Public Adm., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 558–571, 2019, doi: 10.1080/01900692.2018.1491596.
[53]Ö. E. Kurt, “Examining an e-learning system through the lens of the information systems success model: Empirical evidence from Italy,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1173–1184, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9821-4.
[54]H. E. Mandari and D. N. Koloseni, “Determinants of continuance intention of using e-government services in Tanzania: the role of system interactivity as moderating factor,” Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, 2022, doi: 10.1108/TG-05-2022-0077.
[55]S.-C. Chen and C.-P. Lin, “Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: The mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 140, pp. 22–32, 2019.
[56]J. C. Nunnally and I. Bernstein, Psychometric theory. New York, NY, USA.: Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 1994.
[57]F. B. Franque, T. Oliveira, and C. Tam, “Understanding the factors of mobile payment continuance intention: empirical test in an African context,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1–12, 2021.
[58]X. Teng and Z. Bao, “Factors affecting users’ stickiness of fitness apps: an empirical study based on the SOR perspective,” Int. J. Sport. Mark. Spons., 2022.
[59]Y. Dong and C.-Y. J. Peng, “Principled missing data methods for researchers,” Springerplus, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2013.
[60]N. D. Myers, S. Ahn, and Y. Jin, “Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: A Monte Carlo approach,” Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 412–423, 2011.
[61]N. O’Rourke and L. Hatcher, A Step-by-Step Approach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, Second Edi. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute, 2013.
[62]UNESCO, “Higher Education Report,” Barcelona, 2022.
[63]C. Fornell and D. Larcker, “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” J. Mark. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 1981.
[64]J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
[65]G. W. Cheung, H. D. Cooper-Thomas, R. S. Lau, and L. C. Wang, “Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations,” Asia Pacific J. Manag., pp. 1–39, 2023.
[66]L. J. Cronbach, “Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests,” Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297–334, 1951.
[67]T. K. Dijkstra and J. Henseler, “Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling,” MIS Q., vol. 39, no. 2, p. 297 0316, 2015.
[68]J. Henseler, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling,” J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 115–135, 2015.
[69]J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet,” J. Mark. Theory Pract., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011.
[70]A. O. Daoud, H. Omar, A. A. E. Othman, and O. J. Ebohon, “Integrated Framework Towards Construction Waste Reduction: The Case of Egypt,” Int. J. Civ. Eng., vol. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40999-022-00793-2.
[71]A. S. Selya, J. S. Rose, L. C. Dierker, D. Hedeker, and R. J. Mermelstein, “A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f 2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED,” Front. Psychol., vol. 3, pp. 1–6, 2012, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111.
[72]J. Cohen, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. NJ: Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 1988.
[73]T. Ramayah, J. Cheah, F. Chuah, H. Ting, and M. A. Memon, “Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using smartPLS 3.0,” An Updat. Guid. Pract. Guid. to Stat. Anal., 2018.
[74]H. Lin, W. Fan, and P. Y. K. Chau, “Determinants of users’ continuance of social networking sites: A self-regulation perspective,” Inf. Manag., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 595–603, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.03.010.
[75]M. Zhou, X. Cai, Q. Liu, and W. Fan, “Examining continuance use on social network and micro-blogging sites: Different roles of self-image and peer influence,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 47, no. June 2018, pp. 215–232, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.010.
[76]K. L. Hsiao and C. C. Chen, “What drives continuance intention to use a food-ordering chatbot? An examination of trust and satisfaction,” Libr. Hi Tech, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 929–946, 2022, doi: 10.1108/LHT-08-2021-0274.
[77]J. W. Huang and C. P. Lin, “To stick or not to stick: The social response theory in the development of continuance intention from organisational cross-level perspective,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1963–1973, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.003.
[78]H. Jo, “Understanding the key antecedents of users’ continuance intention in the context of smart factory,” Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 153–166, 2023.
[79]C. Liao, F. C. Hsu, and P. L. To, “Exploring knowledge sharing in virtual communities,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 891–909, 2013, doi: 10.1108/OIR-11-2012-0196.
[80]T. G. Sharma, J. Hamari, A. Kesharwani, and P. Tak, “Understanding continuance intention to play online games: roles of self-expressiveness, self-congruity, self-efficacy, and perceived risk,” Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 348–364, 2022, doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1811770.
[81]B. Popp and H. Woratschek, “Consumers’ relationships with brands and brand communities–The multifaceted roles of identification and satisfaction,” J. Retail. Consum. Serv., vol. 35, pp. 46–56, 2017.
[82]D. L. Wann, “Understanding the positive social psychological benefits of sport team identification: The team identification-social psychological health model.,” Gr. Dyn. theory, Res. Pract., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 272, 2006.
[83]K. Y. Hwang, E. H. Sung, and T. Shenkoya, “The Mediating and Combined Effects of Trust and Satisfaction in the Relationship between Collaboration and the Performance of Innovation in Industry–Public Research Institute Partnerships,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14042128.
[84]M. Ismail, E. Celebi, and H. Nadiri, “How Student Information System Influence Students’ Trust and Satisfaction towards the University?: An Empirical Study in a Multicultural Environment,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 111778–111789, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2934782.
[85]J. Venkatakrishnan, R. Alagiriswamy, and S. Parayitam, “Web design and trust as moderators in the relationship between e-service quality, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty,” TQM J., 2023, doi: 10.1108/TQM-10-2022-0298.
[86]Z. Yang, Q. Zhou, D. K. W. Chiu, and Y. Wang, “Exploring the factors influencing continuous usage intention of academic social network sites,” Online Inf. Rev., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1225–1241, 2022, doi: 10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0015.
[87]S. Rahi, M. Alghizzawi, and A. H. Ngah, “Factors influence user’s intention to continue use of e-banking during COVID-19 pandemic: the nexus between self-determination and expectation confirmation model,” EuroMed J. Bus., pp. 1450–2194, 2022, doi: 10.1108/emjb-12-2021-0194.
[88]M. A. Al-Sharafi, M. Al-Emran, M. Iranmanesh, N. Al-Qaysi, N. A. Iahad, and I. Arpaci, “Understanding the impact of knowledge management factors on the sustainable use of AI-based chatbots for educational purposes using a hybrid SEM-ANN approach,” Interact. Learn. Environ., no. May, 2022, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2075014.
[89]M. Olivia and N. K. Marchyta, “The Influence of Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness on E-Wallet Continuance Intention: Intervening Role of Customer Satisfaction,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–22, 2022, doi: 10.9744/jti.24.1.
[90]S. Dokhanian, N. Roustapisheh, S. Heidari, and S. Rezvani, “The Effectiveness of System Quality, Habit, and Effort Expectation on Library Application Use Intention: The Mediating Role of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Satisfaction,” Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1504/ijbis.2022.10049515.
[91]M. Al-Bashayreh, D. Almajali, A. Altamimi, R. Masa’deh, and M. Al-Okaily, “An Empirical Investigation of Reasons Influencing Student Acceptance and Rejection of Mobile Learning Apps Usage,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 7, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14074325.
[92]C. Devos, V. Dupriez, and L. Paquay, “Does the social working environment predict beginning teachers’ self-efficacy and feelings of depression?,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 206–217, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.008.
[93]M. Bahaddin Acat, “Effectiveness of concept maps in vocabulary instruction,” Egit. Arastirmalari - Eurasian J. Educ. Res., no. 33, pp. 1–16, 2008.
[94]P. Sehgal, R. Nambudiri, and S. K. Mishra, “Teacher effectiveness through self-efficacy, collaboration and principal leadership,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 505–517, 2017, doi: 10.1108/IJEM-05-2016-0090.
[95]D. De Neve, G. Devos, and M. Tuytens, “The importance of job resources and self-efficacy for beginning teachers’ professional learning in differentiated instruction,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 47, pp. 30–41, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.003.
[96]M. Al Amin, M. Razib Alam, and M. Z. Alam, “Antecedents of students’ e-learning continuance intention during COVID-19: An empirical study,” E-Learning Digit. Media, vol. 513, 2022, doi: 10.1177/20427530221103915.
[97]Y. Zhu, R. Wang, and C. Pu, “‘I am chatbot, your virtual mental health adviser.’ What drives citizens’ satisfaction and continuance intention toward mental health chatbots during the COVID-19 pandemic? An empirical study in China,” Digit. Heal., vol. 8, 2022, doi: 10.1177/20552076221090031.
[98]S. L. Brue, “Retrospectives: The law of diminishing returns,” J. Econ. Perspect., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 185–192, 1993.
[99]J. R. Pierce and H. Aguinis, “The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management,” J. Manage., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 313–338, 2013.