Asmaa M. El-ashry

Work place: Faculty of computer and information sciences, Computer science dept, Mansoura University, Egypt

E-mail: asmaa_elashry@mans.edu.eg

Website:

Research Interests: Computational Science and Engineering, Computational Learning Theory, Data Structures and Algorithms, Analysis of Algorithms, Combinatorial Optimization

Biography

Asmaa M. El-ashry was born in Dakahlia, Egypt 1989. She received her B.Sc. degree in 2010 from Faculty of Computer and Information Sciences, Computer Science Department, Mansoura University, Egypt. She started working as a researcher and a teaching staff at the same faculty in 2011. In 2012 she started working on her research in computer science. Interested in quantum computing, Machine Learning, Path Planning, optimization algorithms and Data Science.

Author Articles
Enhanced Quantum Inspired Grey Wolf Optimizer for Feature Selection

By Asmaa M. El-ashry Mohammed F. Alrahmawy Magdi Z. Rashad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2020.03.02, Pub. Date: 8 Jun. 2020

Grey wolf optimizer (GWO) is a nature inspired optimization algorithm. It can be used to solve both minimization and maximization problems. The binary version of GWO (BGWO) uses binary values for wolves’ positions rather than probabilistic values in the original GWO. Integrating BGWO with quantum inspired operations produce a novel enhanced quantum inspired binary grey wolf algorithm (EQI-BGWO). In this paper we used feature selection as an optimization problem to evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm EQI-BGWO. Our method was evaluated against BGWO method by comparing the fitness value, number of eliminated features and global optima iteration number. it showed a better accuracy and eliminates higher number of features with good performance. Results show that the average error rate enhanced from 0.09 to 0.06 and from 0.53 to 0.52 and from 0.26 to 0.23 for zoo, Lymphography and diabetes dataset respectively using EQI-BGWO, Where the average number of eliminated features was reduced from 6.6 to 6.7 for zoo dataset and from 7.3 to 7.1 for Lymphography dataset and from 2.9 to 3.2 for diabetes dataset.

[...] Read more.
Other Articles