Software Defined Network: The Next Generation Internet Technology

Full Text (PDF, 417KB), PP.13-24

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Kshira Sagar Sahoo 1,* Sambit Kumar Mishra 1 Sampa Sahoo 1 Bibhudatta Sahoo 1

1. National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India - 769008

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijwmt.2017.02.02

Received: 24 Nov. 2016 / Revised: 3 Jan. 2017 / Accepted: 7 Feb. 2017 / Published: 8 Mar. 2017

Index Terms

SDN, Controller, OpenFlow, Control plane, Data Plane

Abstract

Software Defined Networks is an emerging network paradigm which introduces programmability to networks and has the capability to dynamically configure the network. In a traditional IP based network the control part and the data forwarding elements are imposed in a single box that has very limited ability to configure the network, some vendor specific codes run on the forwarding elements to perform this task. SDN takes another approach by decoupling the controller part from the data plane part. It is the next generation Internet technology that solves the ossification of the Internet, along with creating massive innovations so that network management can be easily handled. In this paper, we are trying to explore the different layers, various protocols supported by SDN, along with discuss the numerous benefits of it.

Cite This Paper

Kshira Sagar Sahoo, Sambit Kumar Mishra, Sampa Sahoo, Bibhudatta Sahoo,"Software Defined Network: The Next Generation Internet Technology", International Journal of Wireless and Microwave Technologies(IJWMT), Vol.7, No.2, pp.13-24, 2017. DOI: 10.5815/ijwmt.2017.02.02

Reference

[1]Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M., Verissimo, P. E., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14-76.

[2]Sahoo, K. S., Mohanty, S., Tiwary, M., Mishra, B. K., & Sahoo, B. (2016, August). A Comprehensive Tutorial on Software Defined Network: The Driving Force for the Future Internet Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Information Communication Technology & Computing (p. 114). ACM.

[3]Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P. K., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., ... & Rao, N. (2013). Are we ready for SDN? Implementation challenges for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 36-43.

[4]Sahoo, K. S., & Sahoo, B. (2016). SDN Architecture on Fog Devices for Realtime Traffic Management: A Case Study.

[5]Gude, N., Koponen, T., Pettit, J., Pfaff, B., Casado, M., McKeown, N., & Shenker, S. (2008). NOX: towards an operating system for networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(3), 105-110.

[6]Wallner, R., & Cannistra, R. (2013). An SDN approach: quality of service using big switch's floodlight open-source controller. Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network, 35, 14-19.

[7]Erickson, D. (2013, August). The beacon openflow controller. In Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking (pp. 13-18). ACM.

[8]Koponen, T., Casado, M., Gude, N., Stribling, J., Poutievski, L., Zhu, M., ... & Shenker, S. (2010, October). Onix: A Distributed Control Platform for Large-scale Production Networks. In OSDI (Vol. 10, pp. 1-6).

[9]Song, H., Gong, J., Chen, H., & Dustzadeh, J. (2014). Unified POF programming for diversified SDN data plane. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.0060.

[10]McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., ... & Turner, J. (2008). OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69-74.

[11]Sahoo, K. S., Sahoo, B., & Panda, A. (2015, December). A secured SDN framework for IoT. In 2015 International Conference on Man and Machine Interfacing (MAMI) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

[12]Kim, H., & Feamster, N. (2013). Improving network management with software defined networking. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(2), 114-119.

[13]Tiwary, M., Sahoo, K. S., Sahoo, B., & Misra, R. (2016). CPS: a dynamic and distributed pricing policy in cyber foraging systems for fixed state cloudlets. Computing, 1-17.

[14]Sahoo, A. K., Sahoo, K. S., & Tiwary, M. (2014, October). Signature based malware detection for unstructured data in Hadoop. In Advances in Electronics, Computers and Communications (ICAECC), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[15]Sahoo, S., Nawaz, S., Mishra, S. K., & Sahoo, B. (2015, December). Execution of real time task on cloud environment. In 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.

[16]Panigrahi, C. R., Tiwary, M., Pati, B., & Das, H. (2016). Big Data and Cyber Foraging: Future Scope and Challenges. In Techniques and Environments for Big Data Analysis (pp. 75-100). Springer International Publishing.

[17]Han, B., Gopalakrishnan, V., Ji, L., & Lee, S. (2015). Network function virtualization: Challenges and opportunities for innovations. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(2), 90-97.

[18]Wallner, R., & Cannistra, R. (2013). An SDN approach: quality of service using big switch's floodlight open-source controller. Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Advanced Network, 35, 14-19.

[19]Pfaff, B., Pettit, J., Koponen, T., Jackson, E., Zhou, A., Rajahalme, J., ... & Amidon, K. (2015). The design and implementation of open vswitch. In 12th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI 15) (pp. 117-130).

[20]Addya, S. K., Sahoo, B., & Turuk, A. K. (2015). Virtual Machine Placement Strategy for Cloud Data Center.

[21]Mishra, S. K., Deswal, R., Sahoo, S., & Sahoo, B. (2015, December). Improving energy consumption in cloud. In 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[22]Puthal, D., Sahoo, B. P. S., Mishra, S., & Swain, S. (2015, January). Cloud computing features, issues, and challenges: a big picture. In Computational Intelligence and Networks (CINE), 2015 International Conference on (pp. 116-123). IEEE.

[23]Raj,K, Tiwary,M, Singh, A.,Sahoo,K.S.,& Sahoo,B.(2016,December). Improving Quality of Services During Device Migration in Software Defined Network. In Proceedings of ICACIE 2016. Springer. 

[24]Sonkoly, B., Gulyas, A., Nemeth, F., Czentye, J., Kurucz, K., Novak, B., & Vaszkun, G. (2012, October). On qos support to ofelia and openflow. In 2012 European Workshop on Software Defined Networking (pp. 109-113). IEEE.

[25]Egilmez, H. E., Dane, S. T., Gorkemli, B., & Tekalp, A. M. (2012). Openqos: Openflow controller design and test network for multimedia delivery with quality of service. Proc NEM Summit, Implementing Future Media Internet Towards New Horiz, 22-27.

[26]Jarraya, Y., Madi, T., & Debbabi, M. (2014). A survey and a layered taxonomy of software-defined networking. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4), 1955-1980.

[27]Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M., Verissimo, P. E., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-defined networking: A comprehensive survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14-76.

[28]Xie, J., Guo, D., Hu, Z., Qu, T., & Lv, P. (2015). Control plane of software defined networks: A survey. Computer Communications, 67, 1-10.

[29]Jammal, M., Singh, T., Shami, A., Asal, R., & Li, Y. (2014). Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges. Computer Networks, 72, 74-98.

[30]Misra, R., Panda, B., & Tiwary, M. (2016, March). Big data and ICT applications: A study. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for Competitive Strategies (p. 41). ACM.