IJWMT Vol. 5, No. 4, 26 Jul. 2015
Cover page and Table of Contents: PDF (size: 318KB)
Full Text (PDF, 318KB), PP.24-36
Views: 0 Downloads: 0
Convolution code, Turbo code, Modulation, AWGN Channel
Mobile wireless system incorporates dual sphere in terms of mobility as well as computing. Such systems have revamped momentously resulting in expedient wireless devices. Current wireless communication requires enormous data rates, streaming audio/video, asymmetric access/multiple access, fully-integrated, low cost, reliable seamless systems with the capability of providing voice, high speed data, and video with minimum latency and long battery life to enhance error free communication. However, there are many obstacles and bottlenecks to achieving this in practice. These bottlenecks include limited spectrum, limited energy, multipath fading and propagation loss, cost, standardization processes. This paper focuses on coding and modulation techniques for wireless communications so as to reduce/overcome many of these obstacles. To put the discussion in perspective, a short background on the coding and modulation approaches of wireless communication systems is provided. The turbo coding is mainly chosen to facilitate the wireless communication. The paper enlightens the impetus behind using turbo codes for high data rate mobile wireless systems. Paper explains how better out-turns can be yielded when approaches like cyclic redundancy check and scrambling are embedded with coding. The BER performance and SNR ratio are observed for illustrating variance between convolution and turbo coding for different rates and modulations. Simulation results are plotted using Matlab software.
Samridhi, Jyoteesh Malhotra,"Performance Evaluation of Channel Codes for High Data Rate Mobile Wireless System", IJWMT, vol.5, no.4, pp.24-36, 2015.DOI: 10.5815/ijwmt.2015.04.03
[1]Samridhi and Dr. Malhotra Jyoteesh; Investigation of Channel Coding Techniques for High Data Rate Mobile Wireless Systems; International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 115 – No. 3, April 2015.
[2]Samridhi and Dr. Jyoteesh Malhotra; Performance bounds in terms of QoS parameters in LTE mobile wireless system; International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering; Vol. 4, Issue 1, January 2015.
[3]Sanjeev Kumar, Ragini Gupta. Performance Comparison of Different Forward Error Correction Coding Techniques for Wireless Communication Systems; IJCST Vol. 2, Issue 3, September 2011.
[4]Ripple Dhingra and Danvir Mandal. Convolutional Code Optimization for Various Constraint Lengths using PSO; International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering. ISSN 0974-2166 Volume 5, Number 2 (2012), pp. 151-157.
[5]Mr.Vishal G. Jadhao, Prof.Prafulla D. Gawande. Performance Analysis of Linear Block Code, Convolution code and Concatenated code to Study Their Comparative Effectiveness; IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSRJEEE) Volume 1, Issue 1 (May-June 2012).
[6]Mr.Sandesh Y.M and Mr.Kasetty Rambabu Implementation of Convolution Encoder and Viterbi Decoder for Constraint Length 7 and Bit Rate ½; Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications ISSN: 2248-9622, Vol. 3, Issue 6, Nov-Dec 2013, pp.42-46.
[7]Patel SnehaBhanubhai, Grace Mary Shajan, Dalal D. Upena; Performance of Turbo Encoder and Turbo Decoder for LTE; International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 2, Issue 6, October 2012.
[8]Nimbalker Ajit, Blankenship Yufei, Classon Brian; ARP and QPP Interleavers for LTE Turbo Coding; WCNC 2008.
[9]Alaa Eldin.S. Hassan, Moawad Dessouky, Atef Abou Elazm and Mona Shokair; Evaluation of Complexity versus Performance for Turbo Code and LDPC under Different Code Rates; SPACOMM 2012: The Fourth International Conference on Advances in Satellite and Space Communications.
[10]Jagdish D. Kene and Dr. Kishor D. Kulat. Iterative Decoding Termination Schemes for Turbo Code Performance Optimization In Mobile Wi-Max Environment; IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 10, Issue 4, No 1, July 2013.
[11]Sara M. Hassan, A. Zekry, M. A. Bayomy, G. Gomah; Software Defined Radio Implementation of LTE Transmitter Physical Layer; International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 74– No.8, July 2013.
[12]Dilip Mandloi, Prateek Paliwal and Deepali Yadav. Performance Evaluation of ½ Rate Convolution Coding with Different Modulation Techniques for DS-CDMA System over Rician Channel; International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 55– No.12, October 2012.
[13]Syed MD. Asif, Abdullah - Al - Maruf, S. M. Anisul Islam, Amitavo Tikader, MD. Abdul Alim. Comparison of ber between uncoded signal and coded signal (using convolution code) over slow rayleigh fading channel; Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, Jan 2010.
[14]Harjot Kaur, Bindiya Jain, Amit Verma. Comparative Performance Analysis of M-ary PSK Modulation Schemes using Simulink; IJECT Vol. 2, Issue 3, Sept. 2011.
[15]Nandaniya S. Jayshree, Kalani B. Nilesh and Dr. Kulkarni G.R.; Comparative Analysis of Different Channel Coding Techniques; IRACST – International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications (IJCNWC) ISSN: 2250-3501 Vol.4, No2, April 2014.