Semantic Question Generation Using Artificial Immunity

Full Text (PDF, 519KB), PP.1-8

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Ibrahim E. Fattoh 1,* Amal E. Aboutabl 2 Mohamed H. Haggag 2

1. Computer Science Dept., Faculty of Information Technology, Misr University for Science & Technology, Egypt

2. Computer Science Dept., Faculty of Computers & Information, Helwan University, Egypt

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2015.01.01

Received: 2 Nov. 2014 / Revised: 5 Dec. 2014 / Accepted: 26 Dec. 2014 / Published: 8 Jan. 2015

Index Terms

Natural Language Processing, Automatic Question Generation, Semantic Role Labeling, Named Entity Recognition, Artificial Immune System

Abstract

This research proposes an automatic question generation model for evaluating the understanding of semantic attributes in a sentence. The Semantic Role Labeling and Named Entity Recognition are used as a preprocessing step to convert the input sentence into a semantic pattern. The Artificial Immune System is used to build a classifier that will be able to classify the patterns according to the question type in the training phase. The question types considered here are the set of WH-questions like who, when, where, why, and how. A pattern matching phase is applied for selecting the best matching question pattern for the test sentence. The proposed model is tested against a set of sentences obtained from many sources such as the TREC 2007 dataset for question answering, Wikipedia articles, and English book of grade II preparatory. The experimental results of the proposed model are promising in determining the question type with classification accuracy reaching 95%, and 87% in generating the new question patterns.

Cite This Paper

Ibrahim E. Fattoh, Amal E. Aboutabl, Mohamed H. Haggag, "Semantic Question Generation Using Artificial Immunity", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science (IJMECS), vol.7, no.1, pp.1-8, 2015. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2015.01.01

Reference

[1]L.Bednarik and L.Kovacs, “Implementation and Assessment of the Automatic Question Generation Module,” CogInfoCom 2012. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cognitive info communications. December 2-5, 2012. Kosice, Solvakia, “DOI:10.1109/CogInfoCom.2012.6421938”.
[2]V. Rus, Z. Cai, and A. Graesser, “Question Generation: Example of A Multi-year Evaluation Campaign,” In Proceedings of 1st Question Generation Workshop, September 25-26, 2008, NSF, Arlington, VA.
[3]S. Kalady, A. Elikkottil, and R. Das, ”Natural Language Question Generation using Syntax and Keywords,” In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 1–10, 2010.
[4]A. Varga, and L.Ha, “Wlv: A Question Generation System for the Qgstec 2010 Task B,” In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 80–83, 2010.
[5]J. Wolfe, “Automatic question generation from text-an aid to independent study,” In ACM SIGCUE Outlook, volume 10, pages 104–112. ACM, 1976.
[6]H. Ali, Y. Chali, and S. Hasan, “Automation of question generation from Sentences,” In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 58–67, 2010.
[7]P. Mannem, R. Prasad, and A. Joshi, “Question generation from paragraphs at upenn: Qgstec system description,” In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 84–91, 2010.
[8]X. Yao, and Y. Zhang, “Question generation with minimal recursion semantics,” In Proceedings of QG2010: The Third Workshop on Question Generation, pages 68–75. Citeseer, 2010.
[9]A. Copestake, D. Flickinger, D. Pollard, and I. Sag,” Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction,” Research on Language and Computation, 3(2-3):281–332, 2005.
[10]Z. Cai, V. Rus, H. Kim, S. C. Susarla, P. Karnam, and C. A. Graesser, “Nlgml: A markup language for question generation,” In Thomas Reeves and Shirley Yamashita, editors, Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learningin Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2006, pages 2747–2752,Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, October 2006. AACE.
[11]W. Wang, T. Hao, and W. Liu, “Automatic Question Generation for Learning Evaluation in Medicine,“ Advances in Web Based Learning- ICWL 2007(2008), 242-251.
[12]N. L. Decastro, "Immune Cognition, Micro-evolution, and a Personal Account on Immune Engineering," S.E.E.D. Journal (Semiotics, Evolution, Energy, and Development). Universidad de Toronto, 3(3). 2003.
[13]D. Dasgupta, "Advances in Artificial Immune Systems," IEEE Computational intelligence magazine, November 2006.
[14]F. S. Mohsen, and A. S. Mohammad, “AISQA: An Artificial Immune Question Answering System,” I.J.Modern Education and Computer Science, 2012, 3, 28-34, “DOI: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.03.04”.
[15]N. L. Decastro, and J. F. Von Zuben “Learninig and Optimization Using Clonal Selection Principle,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, Vol. 6, No. 3, June 2002.
[16]I.Fattoh, A. Aboutable, and M.Haggag, “Sematic Attributes Model for Automatic Generation of Multiple Choice Questions,” International Journal of Compute Applications, Vol 103(1). 18-24, October 2014, “DOI: 10.5120/18038-8544”.
[17]L. Pizzato, and D. Molla,”Indexing on Semantic Roles for Question Answering,” Coling 2008: Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Information Retrieval for Question Answering (IR4QA). pages 74–81. Manchester, UK. August 2008.
[18]M. Palmer, D. Gildea, and P. Kingsbury, “The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles,” Computational Linguistics, 31(1):71–106, 2005.
[19]M. Tkachenko, and A. Simanovisky, “Named Entity Recognition: Exploring Features,” Proceedings of KONVENS 2012 (Main track: oral presentations), Vienna, September 20, 2012
[20]L. Ratinov, and D. Roth, “Design Challenges and Misconceptions in Named Entity Recognition,” CoNLL (2009)
[21]V. Punyakanok, D. Roth, and W. Yih, “The Importance of Syntactic Parsing and Inference in Semantic Role Labeling,” Computational Linguistics (2008).