The Effect of Using Instructional Conversation Method on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners

Full Text (PDF, 256KB), PP.45-51

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Author(s)

Nader Assadi Aidinlou 1,* Shafagh Tabeei 2

1. Department of English Language and Linguistics, IAU, Ahar Branch Authorized translator, Iran

2. Department of Humanities, University of Ahar, Iran

* Corresponding author.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2012.09.06

Received: 17 May 2012 / Revised: 12 Jun. 2012 / Accepted: 13 Jul. 2012 / Published: 8 Sep. 2012

Index Terms

Instructional conversation method, Traditional method, Reading comprehension

Abstract

The present study mainly focused on the impact of Instructional Conversation (IC) method on reading comprehension of Iranian intermediate high school learners. To accomplish the study,71 high school learners studying English. In order to determine their homogeneities in reading comprehension, a reading comprehension test was given to them. Then they based on their own scores, 45 students assigned two experimental groups and one control group, each include 15 students. Control group are taught through the traditional method, first experimental group are taught through Instructional Conversation method and second experimental group received Instructional Conversation with traditional method. After instruction, a post-test was given to them. The findings reveled differences in the performance of the three groups of the study. Based on the result of these study, adopting integrated approach (instructional conversation method plus traditional method) is more useful for increasing reading comprehension of the students.

Cite This Paper

Nader Assadi Aidinlou, Shafagh Tabeei, "The Effect of Using Instructional Conversation Method on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners", International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science(IJMECS), vol.4, no.9, pp.45-51, 2012. DOI:10.5815/ijmecs.2012.09.06

Reference

[1]S, Krashen, Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Prentice Hall, 1987.
[2]J, Cummins, Empowering minority students. Sacramento, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education, 1989.
[3]A. Palincsar, and A. Brown, Reciprocal teaching: A means to meaningful end. In J. Osborn, & R.C. Anderson (Ed.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America Lexington. MA: D.C. Health, 1985.
[4]R. Thrap, and R. Galimore, Rousing mind to life: Teaching, Learning and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
[5]C, Goldenberg, and G, Patthey-Chavez, Discourse processes in instructional conversations: Interactions between teacher and transition readers. Discourse Processor, 1995.
[6]W. Wlien, Forms and phases of discussion. In W. Wilen (Ed.), Teaching and learning through discussion. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1990.
[7]J. Caudill, Mobile technology and its applications in instructional conversation. Retrieved July 1,2012, from http://www.igi-global.com/chapter-mobile-technology-its-applications-instructional/1994
[8]H. Ruston, and P. Schwanefluged, Effects of conversation intervention on the expressive vocabulary development of pre-kinder garden children. LSHSS, 2010.
[9]R. Mead, On Teaching Literature in today's world. Hispaia, 1980.
[10]C. Cazden, Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1988.
[11]K, Chastain, Developing second language skills theory and practice, 3th ed., University of Virginia, 1988.
[12]L. H. Ringler, and C.K. Weber, A language-thinking approach to reading. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc, 1984.
[13]D.R. Reutzel, story map improve comprehension. The reading teacher, 1985.
[14]R.G. Stauffer, The language-experience approach to the teaching of reading. New York: Harper and row, 1980.
[15]C. Goldenberg, Instructional conversations and their classroom application. Educational practice report: 2, National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning. Retrieved, July 1, 2012, from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/ncrcdsll/epr2/index.html,1991.
[16]L.S. Vygotsky, Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.
[17]B. Rogoff, Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
[18]R.G. Thrap, The effective instruction of comprehension: results and description of the Kamehameha early education program. Reading Research Quarterly, 1982.
[19]C. Meskill, and N, Anthony, Learning to orchestrate online instructional conversation. Computer Assisted language learning, 2007.
[20]T.O. Oyetunde,. and J.J. Umolu, The teaching of reading an writing in junior secondary schools: an appraisal. Nigeria Educational Forum, 1989.
[21]D. Williams, English language teaching. An integrated approach. Ibadan: Spectrum Books limited, 1990.
[22]J. Dole, G. Duffy, L. Roehler, and P. Pearson, Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 1991.
[23]D. Rumelhart, Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Doric (ed.), Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1977.